Counterpoints Arts, impact timeline ← Back to the timeline

The research study

Appendices: search strings, topic guides and poll outputs

Supporting material for Between Care and Precarity: creative arts facilitators and the making of refugee narratives in the UK. Published so that the study can be checked, repeated and built on. Nothing here identifies any participant.

Every search string run, with its scope and its result count, across six indexes. Counts are live as at August 2026 and will drift as databases grow.

How to read it. The counts collapse at the same two points every time: when the search requires a UK context, and when it requires the practitioner rather than the participant. That collapse is the gap the study occupies.

Search string (Boolean)Scope and filtersResultsNote
refugee AND artsAll resources, all years50,726Broad baseline scale of the two fields side by side.
refugee AND arts AND wellbeingAll resources, all years379Recedes sharply once the wellbeing focus is added.
refugee AND "participatory arts"All resources, all years52Phrase-precise modality; small, focused literature.
(refugee OR "asylum seeker") AND arts AND facilitatorAll resources, all years142Adding the facilitator concept collapses the field.
(refugee OR "asylum seeker") AND "creative health"All resources, all years1Near-absence of the exact creative-health framing for this population.
"sanctuary seeker" AND artsAll resources, all years3The study’s preferred term is barely represented in the literature.
"asylum seeker" AND "arts" AND "facilitators" AND "England"2021-20252Core row: near-total absence of England-specific, facilitator-focused work.
"creative arts interventions" AND "forced displacement"2021-20265Scarcity of intervention-framed studies for displaced people.
facilitators AND "creative interventions" AND displacement2011-20261Starkest evidence of the facilitator-specific gap.

PubMed

Search string (Boolean)Scope and filtersResultsNote
refugee AND artsAll years452Health-indexed baseline; modest and specific.
refugee AND arts AND "mental health"All years129Health-outcome slice.
refugee AND arts AND wellbeingAll years83Directly on the wellbeing focus.
refugee AND "participatory arts"All years3Phrase-precise; almost no indexed literature.
(refugee OR "asylum seeker") AND arts AND (facilitator OR practitioner)All years50Practitioner framing; few are UK- or facilitator-centred on reading.

PMC

Search string (Boolean)Scope and filtersResultsNote
refugee AND artsAll years10,254Full-text matching inflates counts (any mention anywhere).
refugee AND arts AND "mental health"All years5,471Full-text; broad co-occurrence.
refugee AND arts AND wellbeingAll years2,402Full-text; broad co-occurrence.
refugee AND "participatory arts"All years80Phrase-precise; count drops sharply even in full text.
(refugee OR "asylum seeker") AND arts AND (facilitator OR practitioner)All years7,319High full-text count; precision low, hence indexed sources preferred.

ScienceDirect

Search string (Boolean)Scope and filtersResultsNote
refugee AND artsAll years8,289Full-text baseline.
refugee AND arts AND "mental health"All years2,083Full-text co-occurrence.
refugee AND arts AND wellbeingAll years965Includes Soye and Watters (2024) and Biglin (2025), both directly relevant.
refugee AND "participatory arts"All years38Phrase-precise; small, focused set.
(refugee OR "asylum seeker") AND arts AND (facilitator OR practitioner)All years5,346Full-text; precision low.

The BMJ

Search string (Boolean)Scope and filtersResultsNote
refugee AND artsAll years92Single-journal scale.
refugee AND arts AND (facilitator OR practitioner)All years40Practitioner framing.
refugee AND arts AND wellbeingAll years13Very few wellbeing-and-arts items in this venue.

The Lancet

Search string (Boolean)Scope and filtersResultsNote
(refugee OR "asylum seeker") AND [Lancet family]All years687The venue publishes substantial refugee-health research...
refugee AND arts AND [Lancet family]All years9...but almost none of it engages the arts.
(refugee OR "asylum seeker") AND arts AND [Lancet family]All years9Confirms the arts are near-absent from high-impact medical coverage of displacement.

The screening funnel

Applied to the Web of Science set, and representative of every index searched.

StageFilter appliedRecords
1All concept blocks combined: population, practitioner, activity625,094
2Narrowed to facilitator or practitioner and arts-activity terms22,244
3Child and youth-only studies removed21,197
4Restricted to the UK91
5Refugee or sanctuary AND arts required65
6Current year only37
7Usable after title and abstract screening34
8Precise arts-facilitator × refugee intersection0 to 3

Publication growth, 2015 to 2025

The field is expanding on every index searched. Shown as each database's share of its own decade total, so two very differently sized databases can be compared.

YearPubMed (n)PubMed (% of decade)ScienceDirect (n)ScienceDirect (% of decade)
2015112.6%2395.3%
2016225.3%2435.4%
2017153.6%2986.6%
2018153.6%3778.3%
2019235.5%3337.3%
2020409.6%4229.3%
2021358.4%46910.3%
20227016.8%49110.8%
2023389.1%52811.6%
20246716.1%54011.9%
20258119.4%59713.2%
Total417100%4,537100%

2. Topic guides

The question guides used in the interviews and the focus groups. Both were amended mid-study, with UCL approval, to correct terminology. The versions below are the amended ones.

These are published in full so that anyone running similar research can reuse or challenge them.


2a. Interview guide, first version

Topic Guide for 1-to-1 Interviews with Artists and Creative Facilitators (DRAFT) Purpose: To explore the individual perspectives of artists and creative facilitators on their work with refugee narratives, gathering insights to inform the focus group discussion. (3 Participants)

1. Introduction:

2. Artistic Practice and Personal Influence:

3. Refugee Narratives:

4. Impact of Art:

5. Art and Creative Health Policy:

Take a moment here to explain what the researcher means when asking about “Well-being” perceptions VS “Mental Health” perceptions

6. Challenges and Opportunities:

7. Focus Group Preparation:

8. Closing:


2b. Semi-structured interview guide, amended

Semi-Structured Interview Guide

1. Introduction:

Objective: Establish rapport and gather basic background information.

2. Background and Artistic Practice:

Objective: Explore the artist's personal influences and motivations.

3. Refugee Narratives:

Objective: Understand how refugee stories are integrated into their work.

4. Impact of Art:

Objective: Assess the influence of their art on public understanding and engagement.

5. Art and Creative Health Policy:

Objective: Discuss the potential policy impact and health benefits of art.

6. Challenges and Opportunities:

Objective: Identify challenges faced and opportunities for support.

7. Policy and Advocacy:

Objective: Explore the role of art in policy and public discourse.

8. Focus Group Specific (for preparation and broader impact):

Objective: Discuss collective influence and collaboration.

Take a moment here to explain what the researcher means when asking about “Well-being” perceptions VS “Mental Health” perceptions

9. Closing:

Objective: Wrap up the interview and address any remaining questions.


2c. Focus group guide

Focus group guide (the below is copy-pasted from the amended topic guide, with corrected terminology) Detailed Topic Guide for Focus Group with Artists/Creators and Creative Facilitators (Online) - (DRAFT) Purpose: To facilitate a group discussion among artists/creatives to explore collective insights on the role of art/creative work in refugee narratives and its impact on public perceptions and policies.

1. Welcome and Introductions:

2. Shared Experiences and Artistic Practice:

3. Collective Impact and Public Perception:

4. Art and Mental Health:

Take a moment here to explain what the researcher means when asking about “Well-being” perceptions VS “Mental Health” perceptions

5. Creative Health Policy:

6. Collaboration and Networks:

7. Challenges and Opportunities:

8. Final Thoughts:

Note: These guides are designed to facilitate in-depth and meaningful discussions, both individually and collectively, about the role of art in shaping refugee narratives and influencing public perception, wellbeing, and policy.


3. Mentimeter outputs

Both focus groups used anonymous Mentimeter polling alongside discussion. The full poll screens are held with the study data. What follows is what the polls returned.

Question: how does your combined work influence broader public understanding of refugees and migration?

Response optionSelected
Raises awarenessMost selected
Changes perceptionsMost selected
Encourages empathySeveral
Neutral, or no impactNobody

The finding that matters is the last row. Across both groups, not one facilitator selected any option implying their work has no effect on public understanding. They understand what they do as narrative intervention, not cultural decoration.

Question: rate the impact of art on mental health and community resilience within refugee communities

Facilitators in both groups gave average ratings among the two highest points on the scale.

The discussion that followed qualified it in two ways, and both qualifications came from the participants rather than from the researcher:

That second point is a caution from practitioners about their own medium, and it is one of the more useful things in the dataset.


4. Holding Space: the reported survey figures

The full survey data tables are held with the evaluation. These are the figures reported in it.

MeasureFigure
Registered for the London gathering, January 202661
Attendees, Creativity Displacement and Mental Health webinar, April 202534
Practitioners signed up across the London event and the spring webinar60+
Satisfaction, London respondents5 out of 5, every respondent
Relevance to their work, London respondents4 or 5 out of 5
Bradford survey respondents8
Respondents reporting dissatisfaction, any location0

Who was in the room. London drew museum professionals, artists, mental health clinicians, academics and sanctuary seekers. The April webinar drew people from NHS trusts, arts organisations, universities and grassroots refugee groups. Belfast drew festival organisers, community volunteers, local government and youth workers. Bradford was the national gathering, and provided live captioning and British Sign Language interpretation.


Still to be published

Four things on the original list are not here, because they are documents or images rather than text that can be reconstructed:

Plus the two published documents, the Mental Health Framework and the Protocol of Care, which have their own page.

If you would like any of these, please ask and we will send them to you directly.


This material describes research with real people. All participants are pseudonymised and all quotes are published with consent under UCL ethics approval. Please cite with care.